When they first appear, in the late Paleocene, in the genus Paramys, we are already dealing with a typical, if rather primitive, true rodent, with the definitive ordinal characters well developed. Presumably, of course, they had arisen from some basal, insectivorous, placental stock; but no transitional forms are known.
Primary source references As a preface to this document, I want to point out that it is a shame that we have to continue to refute the same arguments that evolutionists keep bringing up over and over again in their attempts to argue against the fact of creation, which fact has been well established since the day the earth was created ex nihilo several thousand years ago.
Nevertheless, the neo-Darwinian dogma of the spontaneous auto-organization of random chemicals into complex biopolymers, by chance forming complex self-replicating automatic machines that then evolve into more and more complex self-replicating automatic machines through genetic transcriptional errors and the injection of random noise, filtered into highly coded information and structures by predators, the climate, and other mindless agents working together to produce an ecosystem capable of sustaining and improving all these countless life forms for billions of years has managed to permeate, over the last years, the thinking in major scientific circles, the media, and secular education, even penetrating some professing Christian institutions.
It is also a shame that the masses have bought all this based on some circular reasoning about fossils, where fossils tend to be found buried, similarities between various life forms, the presence of certain decay products in rocks, and other inherently speculative arguments about the past, based on phenomena that exist in the present.
If I hope to accomplish anything, it will be to simply encourage critical thinking. One must get past the arguments ad populum that its popularity counts for somethingad hominem that if you attack the person making the argument, this counts for somethingand especially ad baculum that there are people who have the clout to decree it as trueto ask the key questions and challenge the unsubstantiated assumptions and thinking of those who would hold to the evolution position.
Today there are an increasing number of anti-creationist authors who are producing books and periodicals that make this relatively brief presentation insufficient to deal with all the points in dispute. They must also keep a level head in the face of some vicious attacks and diatribes that will be directed against them, as is advised in the scriptures 1 Peter 3: By way of definitions, I want to point out that when I speak of "evolution," I am referring to the popular contemporary use of the word, which in a nutshell is the belief that all life forms are related by ancestry, and that the first life form occurred spontaneously, all due to completely natural processes.
This document is not a scientific thesis, but an apologetic intended to be submitted and defended by me in an interactive, online electronic forum. I claim no copyright on this document, and grant its use to the public domain.
I have not written it with a view towards receiving any sort of financial or other personal gain, and I request that others utilizing this document do likewise. Those copying and disseminating this document shall assume full responsibility for defending it. I do not agree to defend this document in any forum that I did not submit it, due to the practical limitations of my own time.
The original source of this document is located at http: I should point out that I do not consider myself an authority on the leading edge of modern creationism, although it may seem so to the uninitiated.
Those wishing to be on the forefront of knowledge must look beyond this paper. I am not a scientist, but an engineer by education and profession. Even so, it is my conviction that no substantial scientific training or experience is required to confront evolutionism and defend recent creation.
I wish to thank my critics, especially those anti-creationists whom I have encountered along the way, for helping to expose deficiencies in my presentation, which has contributed greatly to the continuing refinement of this document.
I also wish to thank those who have encouraged me by telling me that this presentation has made a difference. As design demonstrates the existence and capability of a designer, the inherent design in life, the earth and the universe implies the existence and capability of its Designer.
The best source of information regarding a design can be had by inquiring of the designer. A designer provides better and more authoritative information about his design than the design does about itself.
In the case of life on earth, the Designer has unmistakenly identified Himself and revealed specific information about some of the circumstances surrounding creation.
A defense of Creation Chance does not cause anything. In fact, within the laws of probabilities and statistics we should not expect order and selection to be the result of "random" processes. Order and selection are the result of directed, non-random causes.
The laws of biochemistry, probability and statistics, and basic information theory are against it. It has never been demonstrated in the laboratory. Effects caused by random genetic mutations that is, those that are phenotypically expressed are almost always bad.
Once in a while they produce some interesting benign abnormalities. But no one has ever shown them to be beneficial, so as to result in complex and sophisticated designs. Random genetic mutations The "survival of the fittest" clause is a tautology and success does not imply complexity.
Natural Selection Genetics disproves evolution. Animals vary based on coded genetic information that is already there. This is the principle of micro-evolution, which has been verified by the scientific method. Genetics and Micro-evolution Similarity does not imply ancestry.
Evolutionary taxonomy is an effort based purely upon speculation and prior acceptance of the evolution model.
Most recent additions to this Reading Room; David Lane & Andrea Diem-Lane, Listening to the Inner Sound, The Perennial Practice of Shabd Yoga, September Knut K. Wimberger, The Future of Work and Eduction, and What We Can Do Now, September Keith Price, On Our Alleged Insignificance, September Joe Corbett, Atman . The Rogerian Style of Argument - One of the elements of the Rogerian argument is cooperation. There will always be disagreements among people, especially within the United States Government and between politicians, this is more apparent now than ever. s noted in the Introduction, our intent was to continue to add to our collection of quote urbanagricultureinitiative.com is the third such addition and includes assorted quote mines that do not share any unifying "theme," as did our previous additions: Darwin Quotes and Gould, Eldredge and Punctuated Equilibria Quotes. Since these quotes are not from a single source, as .
Any discussion of "transitional forms" is based purely upon speculation and conjecture, and is therefore moot and useless. Transitional forms The fossil record of life forms does not support evolution. The animals now fossilized were as complex back then as they are today.
They seem to have appeared abruptly. The fossil record is consistent with creation according to separate kinds.They claim that creationism is a religious doctrine, and it is, but evolution is just as religious as creationism (Theissen, Kerwin).
A religion is a belief system and evolution is a belief. It is basically confidence in an idea that cannot be proven, but one believes in it because of faith. However, the evolution is majorly supported by scientists who advocate the evolution theory.
Most of these scientists despise the idea of existence of the supernatural being and argue that life evolved exclusively without any intervention of a supreme being.
graduate the ses and dissertations and the ses how to write a dissertation introduction key cover page research paper apa loading reflective essay good manners with max good quotes for college essays online argumentative essay on financial literacy essays on making mistakes in life student teaching internship reflection essays essay on values and virtues the parts of a five paragraph essay.
Evolution vs creationism argumentative essay on abortion. Evolution vs creationism argumentative essay on abortion. 4 stars based on reviews urbanagricultureinitiative.com Essay. Mondofacto dissertations.
Cefr a1. Most recent additions to this Reading Room; David Lane & Andrea Diem-Lane, Listening to the Inner Sound, The Perennial Practice of Shabd Yoga, September Knut K. Wimberger, The Future of Work and Eduction, and What We Can Do Now, September Keith Price, On Our Alleged Insignificance, September Joe Corbett, Atman .
s noted in the Introduction, our intent was to continue to add to our collection of quote urbanagricultureinitiative.com is the third such addition and includes assorted quote mines that do not share any unifying "theme," as did our previous additions: Darwin Quotes and Gould, Eldredge and Punctuated Equilibria Quotes.
Since these quotes are not from a single source, as .