Rommel rundstedt controversy essay

He came of conservative Prussian stock with a strong sense of duty and service to the State; his father had been a district judge. His upbringing had been happy, but sternly intellectual and moral; his legal training had pointed to a career in local administration and economics

Rommel rundstedt controversy essay

Development of Aircraft Guns, Ammunition and Installations ' - details on my website: A British War Office analysis of Panther tanks destroyed in revealed that only fourteen resulted from air attack eleven to RPs and three to aircraft cannon.

It was subsequently discovered that there had only been a total of tanks or tank destroyers deployed by the Germans and just 46 of those were lost, of which only nine could be attributed to air attack seven to RPs and two to bombs.

Shortly afterwards, the battlefield was examined and only armoured vehicles of all types were found, of which just 33 had been the victim of any sort of air attack. In the retreat to the Seine, large numbers of armoured vehicles were left behind and Typhoon pilots alone claimed destroyed, but only thirteen out of AFVs examined were found to have been knocked out by RP attack.

In the Ardennes salient, just seven out of knocked-out AFVs were definitely or possibly attributed to air attack, compared with claims for It should be noted that in the prevailing circumstances of a continuing retreat, there was no question of the German Army having recovered any damaged tanks in these later actions, in fact the battlefields were often littered with undamaged tanks abandoned by their crews.

One source estimates that probably no more than about tanks were lost due to hits from air weapons during the entire Normandy campaign. The ineffectiveness of air attack against tanks should have caused no surprise because the weapons available to the fighter-bombers were not suitable for destroying them.

Put simply, the heavy machine guns and 20 mm cannon were capable of hitting the tanks easily enough, but insufficiently powerful to damage them, except occasionally by chance.

The RPs and bombs used were certainly capable of destroying the tanks but were too inaccurate to hit them, except occasionally by chance.

Other Topics

Please note I added to my original question, information I left out The Henschel was designed for one purpose only Despite it not being a great aircraft such as the Typhoon, out of the two, in my opinion, it did it's job better.Rommel vs. Rundstedt: Strategic Differences and the Panzer Controversy.

The second greatest interference to Rommel’s command was the lack of one cohesive defense strategy and arguing amongst high-level German officers at OKW and OB West, which was compounded by the confusing command structure in the west.

[1]Dieter Ose. “Rommel and Rundstedt The Panzer Controversy.” Military Affairs, 8.

Rommel rundstedt controversy essay

[2]Dieter Ose. “Rommel and Rundstedt: The Panzer Controversy.” Military Affairs, 50, 9. [3]Gerhard Loose. “The German high Command and the Invasion of France.” Military Affairs, 11, . Nov 03,  · Von Rundstedt's loss in power was symptomatic with the declining influence of the old guard, and Rommel's increasing control was indicative of the coming of age of the new generation, who had become generals by the grace of Hitler.


Barbarossa Harekâtı - Vikipedi

Cagle’s response is correct. Rommel wanted the armor right behind the beaches. See The Rommel Papers, B. H. Liddell-Hart and Lucia Rommel, editors, London, Collins, (Rommel left hidden journals which his wife Lucia and his son Manfred knew of, and which were published after the war.) The.

Analyzes the German Panzer controversy and compares the views and personalities of Field Marshal Erwin Rommel and Field Marshal Gerd von Rundstedt.

Rommel rundstedt controversy essay

Rommel's idea was to defeat the enemy on the beaches by dispersing the armored force along the length of the coast, whereas von Rundstedt preferred. Blitzkrieg (German, "lightning war" listen (help · info)) is a method of warfare whereby an attacking force, spearheaded by a dense concentration of armoured and motorised or mechanised infantry formations with close air support, breaks through the opponent's line of defence by short, fast, powerful attacks and then dislocates the defenders, using .